Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Kahn vs. Van der Rohe



Louis Kahn and Mies Van der Rohe were considered two of the greatest architects during the early 1900’s. They both had many similarities in relation to their designs, yet they were both unique in their own ways. To begin, Mies Van der Rohe, born in 1886, was commonly regarded as one of the pioneering masters of modern architecture. He, like many of the architects of his time, was striving to establish a new style of architecture to properly represent the modern times. He accomplished this by the simplest and clearest geometries, forms, and concepts. Much like Semper, Mies was very logically driven in his forms yet desired to represent the articulation of the building in response to the fluidity of life. He was a rationalist in the way he used repeatable forms and created interplay between columns and walls. In relation to his floor plans, he strongly desired to abolish allowing rooms creating the organization. In addition to this, Mies also wanted to abolish the center of the house.

Tugendhat House
As is seen in the floor plans of the Tugendhat House (1930), there is no single point or room that can be seen or labeled as the center of the house. All the rooms are scattered throughout the plan without the sense of single axis or grid to arrange and organize the spaces. Though there is a distinct curved wall which forms a dining room in the center of the house (middle plan), the views are cut off by the walls which gives the feeling of a small, unimportant space. Once in this space, your view is distracted by the largeness of the east room adjacent to the dining space which seems to be the main living area of the house which is in fact not in the center of the house. This is also seen in many of his housing designs. 


Moving on, Louis Kahn, born in 1901, was mainly known for combining Modernism with the weight and dignity of ancient monuments and monumental masses. The Exeter Library, for example, was created for the Phillips Exeter Academy and designed to become the monument of the Academy. Climbing to the top of the stairs and approaching the entrance to the building, one can easily understand the layout of the structure. This was seen as a major importance to Kahn. As is seen in the floor plans (ground floor – left; 2nd floor – right), he desired that people be able to move at ease. This was accomplished by having an open floor plan in addition to a completely symmetrical form for easy understanding of location within. Unlike Mies, the spaces Kahn designed were to be easily understood when standing at any given point on the plan, instead of designing so that the experience of the spaces differs from room to room.  
1st Floor
2nd Floor


No comments:

Post a Comment